-> A *small* "driver" to access the other machine's file system -> would be quite useful. And via the parallel port this would -> be reasonably fast too. - What's wrong with interlnk/intersvr? You won't get any smaller. If you need more, then have a look at NS-LAN. It's around half a meg in size (less for server-only or client-only installation). It boots from the command line, so there's no overhead when you're not using it. Very tidy and well-behaved. It use it often. - Cheers, Steven To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Constant Brouerius van Nidek
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Mike Webb
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Fraser Farrell
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Travis Siegel
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Mike Webb
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Chad A. Fernandez
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Chad A. Fernandez
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem John Oram
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Dr. Gregory Doria
