hammer wrote:
> > What's wrong with interlnk/intersvr? You won't get any smaller. If you
> > need more, then have a look at NS-LAN. It's around half a meg in size
> > (less for server-only or client-only installation).
>
> As I don't know "interlnk/intersvr" (where's that to find ?) I couldn't
> comment on its properties.
> But in any case "around half a meg in size" would definitely class it
> off for use with DOS.
I believe the "around half a meg in size" was refering to the NS-LAN,
not interlink and intersvr. Interlink and Intersvr come with MS-DOS and
PC-DOS. They work well....when it works. I have had trouble hooking
certain computers together and accessing certain drives...never did
figure out why. I am only using one computer with plenty of HD space,
so now I am not using them.
Chad A. Fernandez
Battle Creek, MI
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
