> From: Steven Darnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What's wrong with interlnk/intersvr? You won't get any smaller. > If you need more, then have a look at NS-LAN. It's around half a > meg in size (less for server-only or client-only installation). > It boots from the command line, so there's no overhead when you're > not using it. Very tidy and well-behaved. It use it often. I've heard NS-LAN referred to twice here. Where does one get a copy of this program? Is it shareware/freeware/commercial/?? Thanks. To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Constant Brouerius van Nidek
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Mike Webb
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Fraser Farrell
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Travis Siegel
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Mike Webb
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Chad A. Fernandez
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Chad A. Fernandez
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem John Oram
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null mode... Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Steven Darnold
- [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Dr. Gregory Doria
- Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem Charles Dye
