Hear, hear, I did my entire thesis using LateX and Nedit and had no problems
at all, the quality of the output with LateX is astonishing, and then there
are all those cute little tricks with psutils... :-)
k.
>||
>|| On 5 Jan, Zulfiqar Naushad wrote:
>|| >
>|| > Which is the best text editor around?
>|| >
>|| > To be honest, I use JOE, and PICO sometimes, but I want something
better.
>|| > But
>|| > please don't reccomend something that has a HUGE learning curve......
>|| >
>|| >
>|| > Thanks in Advance.
>|| >
>|| > Zulfiqar!
>|| >
>|| > -
>|| > To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>|| > this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
>|| > Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and
the
>|| > archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
>||
>|| I like nedit for things. If I want to brew some coffee, take a walk
>|| around the block, and conquer world hunger, I just start up emacs :)
>|| BTW, nedit comes with suse 5.3; has a nice interface, easy to setup and
>|| use, and looks familiar. I am a user on the win32 side of
>|| ultraedit32. It has a great interface and ability. Nothing beats pico
>|| for a lot of stuff though.
>
>I personally am a fan of emacs, and I guess I always be. As we sit here and
>talk about what is the best editor, I love the fact that not only is emacs
a
>superior editor to any, but if there are feature that I like about a given
>editor, I can always add it to emacs.
>
>Of course I am also a person who would rather LaTeX and a good style,
rather
>than a Gooey (or is that GUI) whiz bang, word processor. It is the purist
in me
>(or is it masachist?).
>
>- ---
>Kim C. Callis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>*********************************
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
