Hi! > > I think performance shouldn't be hurt, since we're still batching > > pages 1% at a time, down from 20%. A normal image has 10's of > > thousands of pages (mine 512M laptop is ~55000 pages, for example) so > > 1% is still~500 pages or ~2M at a time. > > I don't know to if it would impact performance, somebody else > should think a bit more about that maybe. The option (early writeout) is > configurable however, so people can shut it of if they think it slows > writing down. > > The patch looks OK to me.
Well, patch does not look too bad to me, but... "It is an option, so it is not important to get it right" is ugly. It would be nice to actually benchmark this, and hardcode the option that provides acceptable performance... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
