On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:27:19 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Monday, 18 September 2006 13:17, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > "It is an option, so it is not important to get it right" is > > > > ugly. It would be nice to actually benchmark this, > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > > and hardcode the option that provides acceptable performance... > > > > > > That would be difficult, because it changes substantially from one > > > machine to another (depends on the CPU speed, hard disk speed > > > etc.). > > > > Well, our task is "write image to disk, as fast as possible". That > > should be doable, no? > > The problem is on some machines the early writeout hurts performance > and improves it on some others ... > > > > But I think it only is useful with splash, isn't it? I don't really know, but the HOWTO says 'early writeout' actually speeds the process up on some machines. > > > If so, we can hardcode something reasonable that will be used if > > > splash_param is set and won't be used at all otherwise. > > > > Hmm.. we can probably do that. Is smoothly-running progressbar > > really all that important? Apparently it is important to Jason;) For me, it all depends on how much the trade of is. If it is an unnoticeable difference (1-2 seconds) on average hardware, than I would rather have a smooth progress bar. If it is more than that ... grts Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
