On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:01:05 +0200 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi! > > > > I think performance shouldn't be hurt, since we're still batching > > > pages 1% at a time, down from 20%. A normal image has 10's of > > > thousands of pages (mine 512M laptop is ~55000 pages, for example) so > > > 1% is still~500 pages or ~2M at a time. > > > > I don't know to if it would impact performance, somebody else > > should think a bit more about that maybe. The option (early writeout) is > > configurable however, so people can shut it of if they think it slows > > writing down. > > > > The patch looks OK to me. > > Well, patch does not look too bad to me, but... > > "It is an option, so it is not important to get it right" is ugly. That was not what I said. I meant to say, that it could be that people find it more important that the progress bar runs nice and smoothly, than that it takes a few seconds longer. > It would be nice to actually benchmark this, and hardcode the option that > provides acceptable performance... Sure, maybe Jason can provide some numbers. grts Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
