Hi, On Monday, 18 September 2006 13:17, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > "It is an option, so it is not important to get it right" is ugly. It > > > would be nice to actually benchmark this, > > > > Agreed. > > > > > and hardcode the option that provides acceptable performance... > > > > That would be difficult, because it changes substantially from one machine > > to another (depends on the CPU speed, hard disk speed etc.). > > Well, our task is "write image to disk, as fast as possible". That > should be doable, no?
The problem is on some machines the early writeout hurts performance and improves it on some others ... > > But I think it only is useful with splash, isn't it? If so, we can hardcode > > something reasonable that will be used if splash_param is set and > > won't be used at all otherwise. > > Hmm.. we can probably do that. Is smoothly-running progressbar really > all that important? Not to me. :-) Rafael -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel