Hi,
On Monday, 18 September 2006 13:17, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > "It is an option, so it is not important to get it right" is ugly. It
> > > would be nice to actually benchmark this,
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > and hardcode the option that provides acceptable performance...
> >
> > That would be difficult, because it changes substantially from one machine
> > to another (depends on the CPU speed, hard disk speed etc.).
>
> Well, our task is "write image to disk, as fast as possible". That
> should be doable, no?
The problem is on some machines the early writeout hurts performance
and improves it on some others ...
> > But I think it only is useful with splash, isn't it? If so, we can hardcode
> > something reasonable that will be used if splash_param is set and
> > won't be used at all otherwise.
>
> Hmm.. we can probably do that. Is smoothly-running progressbar really
> all that important?
Not to me. :-)
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
