> Sorry, Erix, didn't want to pick on you! Just trying to put words on > why I was uncomfortable with your version... :-) You're welcome ;)
Le 8 juin 06, à 09:36, Ian Thomas a écrit : > Have just checked the XML spec - and tags can't start with a number as > a character, so unfortunately erix's version won't work. It was just for clarity. > > Also, just thinking it through - tags which vary their names (i.e. we > don't know whether the first child of <matrix> would be <1> or <2> or > <99>, or whether any given element <1> would have children or not) > make it harder for the XSL transform and also for creating a > validating schema (if you wanted to do so). This is the point why I was proposing nesting as a mean of sequence. The order of the child will be maningful. I think your proposition is harder to analyse from a xslt point of view : >> <matrix> >> 1,2,3,4, >> 4,2,5,4, >> 1,1,3,9, >> 9,2,3,1 >> </matrix> or >> <matrix> >> <row values="1,2,3,4"/> >> <row values="4,2,5,4"/> >> <row values="1,1,3,9"/> >> <row values="9,2,3,1"/> >> </matrix> We've got to find a nested and sequencial structure in xml. Cheers. ----------- erixtekila http://blog.v-i-a.net/ _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
