I thought I had this answered, but couldn’t find it in the list archives, so here it go again. Sorry if it is a duplicate.
BTW, please check your MUA, it is prepending a ‘Re: ’ every time you answer. On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:50:00 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F3natas_Ferreira?= wrote: > Em 2006/05/31, às 01:27, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA escreveu: > >> But to sum it up: besides infringing IBB’s copy rights, if we >> put something else than Revisada to fill up PorAA’s omission, we would >> create an textual Frankenstein. >> > I agree, but only in part. I was only trying to help solve a problem that > I see no solution for it in the near future. And I'm sure I have enough > expertise to do the minor changes we'd need to do (even though I'm not a > scholar). The problem here is not minor changes, but the omissions. They should be restored from the original, not transplanted from another text nor retranslated. > Anyway, I think we'll not get anywhere with this discussion. JUERP will > not answer sooner enough They have already answered, ¿haven’t you read their answer? As I said, check the archives. > (although I think they will never ask we remove > PorAA for the same reason). Sorry, I didn’t got your reasoning. ¿Which reason? > My work, for now on, is to start asking for > permissions for other versions. Good. > ARC is a good start. ¿Which one? The public domain ones are obsolete, I think Tradução Brasileira would be a better start. That is, supposing you are talking about Revista e Corrigida. > I have a module built and I have a hard copy of it with no copyright > statement (SBP's edition). Lack of a copy rights statement means nothing at all. We need to know the date of publication and the country’s legislation. > Also, if you brazilians want, we can have booth portuguese ARC and > brazilian ARC. I can read both, anyway, as well as all the portuguese I > know, educated or not. I just like ours better than yours. I am fazed. ARC is a Brazilian version, it is RA which is considered ‘lusitanisante’. Are they correlated? > In the mean while, I'd like to take a look at the AVR module that you > created, Leandro. I can't find a working link in the list. This link — > http://dutra.fastmail.fm./pt-BR_JFA_Rev2.(osis|ubnd).bz2 — is a dead end. > As well as all the others I tried (except for one that didn't had what I > wanted...). Can you send me a working link? Two problems here. First, my web site provider has stopped honouring the root domain in the canonical form of the domain name; second, you missed the regexp at the end. So, go for http://dutra.fastmail.fm/pt-BR_JFA_Rev2.osis.bz2 for example. -- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA +55 (11) 5685 2219 http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +55 (11) 9406 7191 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BRASIL _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page