Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi Alan, > > sorry for my late reply, I was moving to Nevada/Reno, but now things > seem to settle down a bit. > > >> Have added minimal doc files to repository (~100K attached patch file). >> They compiled OK with 'make html'. I will do it this way from now on. >> > > Now it looks good, thanks for the patch! > > I pushed your patch into my repository here for the time being: > > http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/alan2 > > What happens if people don't have latex installed? E.g. how > matplotlib/numpy/scipy handle this? I want to follow the same path. > Then I push it in. > > Ondrej > > > > > Would a simple answer be to not have the xdvi function call latex and xdvi if they are not in the path and simply generate a .tex output file (operate in the same way as LatexPrinter). That would be a simple change. Of course why would anyone use a latex driver if they didn't have latex and xdvi? Note that I did not have to use the latex_ex module to display the results, but the ascii version of the output would not be as clear.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
