On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Alan Bromborsky <abro...@verizon.net> wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi Alan, >> >> sorry for my late reply, I was moving to Nevada/Reno, but now things >> seem to settle down a bit. >> >> >>> Have added minimal doc files to repository (~100K attached patch file). >>> They compiled OK with 'make html'. I will do it this way from now on. >>> >> >> Now it looks good, thanks for the patch! >> >> I pushed your patch into my repository here for the time being: >> >> http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/alan2 >> >> What happens if people don't have latex installed? E.g. how >> matplotlib/numpy/scipy handle this? I want to follow the same path. >> Then I push it in. >> >> Ondrej >> >> > >> >> > Would a simple answer be to not have the xdvi function call latex and > xdvi if they are not in the path and simply generate a .tex output file > (operate in the same way as LatexPrinter). That would be a simple > change. Of course why would anyone use a latex driver if they didn't > have latex and xdvi? Note that I did not have to use the latex_ex
That's right, but I meant doing "make html". If you do that, it runs latex (with your patch applied), at least for me. So I was just curious what happens if I don't have latex and if it breaks, how to fix it, or wheter we should require latex present to build our docs. > module to display the results, but the ascii version of the output would > not be as clear. Right. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
