Le 2/13/12 11:40 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
On 13/02/2012 11:34, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 2/13/12 10:15 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
Ok, so here's the proposed plan:
Today: I'll send an e-mail to [email protected] and
[email protected] inviting people to subscribe to syncope
incubator mailing lists, warning that in one week time these two Google
groups will be put in archive mode;
Next Mon 20th: I'll put the two Google groups in archive mode.
Next Mon 20th: I'll change the address at the two Nabble forum archives.
Keep in mind that we don't have fora at The ASF. We only have a
mailing list, which may not be the best thing for users. For
developpers, a forum is not teh right place to discuss about the
project, that's for sur, but for user, it would be a good idea to
discuss if you guys want you keep them.
Otherwise, I'm fine with the proposal.
I proposed Nabble because it could act as an archive (very well indexed
by Google, indeed) of all discussions about Syncope, either for dev and
users: since I can easily change the ML address, Nabble can become the
place where you can find what discussed so far - as Google groups
archive, and what we'll discuss from now onwards - as Apache modbox or
Markmail.
Anyway, Nabble can be configured to allow posting only from people
subscribed to the correspondent Apache ML: I guess this should be the
way how other Apache projects - like as OpenJPA, for example - manage
things.
Does it look better?
What is important is that discussions about the development happen on
the ASF mailing lists. That it is duplicated on any other archives is a
no brainer. Sooner or later, people will subscribe on The ASF mailing
list, and nabble will just become history. If I can't get all the mails
when checking the syncope-dev ML, because some other discussions
happened only on nabble, then this is clearly a no go.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
