Le 2/13/12 11:53 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
On 13/02/2012 11:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 2/13/12 11:40 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
Does it look better?
What is important is that discussions about the development happen on
the ASF mailing lists. That it is duplicated on any other archives is
a no brainer. Sooner or later, people will subscribe on The ASF
mailing list, and nabble will just become history. If I can't get all
the mails when checking the syncope-dev ML, because some other
discussions happened only on nabble, then this is clearly a no go.
Ok, I understand the principle here: so, both Nabble forums will be used as:
* archive for any mail sent to syncope-dev and syncope-user ASF MLs
* e-mail form submission to syncope-dev and syncope-user ASF MLs, and
this will be allowed only for people subscribed to MLs
I guess this should comply with rules: right?
Hmm, let me rephrase it to be sure we are on the same page :
- discussion about the Syncope dev *must* happen on [email protected], and
can be archived on nable (no, the opposite is not the right way to do
things)
- archive is a non issue here : The ASF archives messages, but it's a
side effect on having the dev mailing list hosted at The ASF.
Bottom line, what is really crucial is that "if it's not on the (ASF)
mailing list, it hasn't happened'. That's for dev, not for users... The
dev mailing list is not an archive.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
