On 13/02/2012 11:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 2/13/12 11:40 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
>> On 13/02/2012 11:34, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>> Le 2/13/12 10:15 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
>>>> Ok, so here's the proposed plan:
>>>>
>>>> Today: I'll send an e-mail to [email protected] and
>>>> [email protected] inviting people to subscribe to syncope
>>>> incubator mailing lists, warning that in one week time these two
>>>> Google
>>>> groups will be put in archive mode;
>>>>
>>>> Next Mon 20th: I'll put the two Google groups in archive mode.
>>>>
>>>> Next Mon 20th: I'll change the address at the two Nabble forum
>>>> archives.
>>> Keep in mind that we don't have fora at The ASF. We only have a
>>> mailing list, which may not be the best thing for users. For
>>> developpers, a forum is not teh right place to discuss about the
>>> project, that's for sur, but for user, it would be a good idea to
>>> discuss if you guys want you keep them.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I'm fine with the proposal.
>> I proposed Nabble because it could act as an archive (very well indexed
>> by Google, indeed) of all discussions about Syncope, either for dev and
>> users: since I can easily change the ML address, Nabble can become the
>> place where you can find what discussed so far - as Google groups
>> archive, and what we'll discuss from now onwards - as Apache modbox or
>> Markmail.
>>
>> Anyway, Nabble can be configured to allow posting only from people
>> subscribed to the correspondent Apache ML: I guess this should be the
>> way how other Apache projects - like as OpenJPA, for example - manage
>> things.
>>
>> Does it look better?
>
> What is important is that discussions about the development happen on
> the ASF mailing lists. That it is duplicated on any other archives is
> a no brainer. Sooner or later, people will subscribe on The ASF
> mailing list, and nabble will just become history. If I can't get all
> the mails when checking the syncope-dev ML, because some other
> discussions happened only on nabble, then this is clearly a no go.

Ok, I understand the principle here: so, both Nabble forums will be used as:
* archive for any mail sent to syncope-dev and syncope-user ASF MLs
* e-mail form submission to syncope-dev and syncope-user ASF MLs, and
this will be allowed only for people subscribed to MLs

I guess this should comply with rules: right?
Thanks.

-- 
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to