>And someone mentioned Curtis Johnson. Prime example of running big well in
a
certain meet does not matter, he season mattered more. But that is in direct
contrast with the number 1 in the 200 m.
And there are biases(?). I am told that they do not exist, but I see them
everywhere. Whether it is group affiliation, country, or event it is there.
I see it is clear that some biases are OK, and others are not. OK.>
Better yet Darrell it was merely a case where Johnson's season mattered more
for him but Williams meet in sacremento mattered more for him. Since they say
head to heads and times do not count as much as performances in big meets I
am confused as to why the olympic trials silver medalist Johnson was ranked
#9 in the US. I didn't know that the US had 8 other guys entered into the
Olympic Games 100m.
DMC
Fortune does not change men; it unmasks them.
