On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 07:52, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's a challenging one, but it's possible to use a lifecycle prefix > like proposed:aeroway=aerodrome or abandoned=yes? > > If 2 prefixes can be added, you could use > abandoned:proposed:aeroway=aerodrome > To my mind there is a problem with applying lifecycle prefixes to physical objects: they vanish from the map (standard carto). It's great for cases like a pub that has closed but there's a possibility of it being bought and re-opened: disused:amenity=pub. Not so good for abandoned buildings: abandoned:building=yes because something that is clearly present on the ground (with broken windows and other damage) vanishes from the map. Which is why, for physical objects, I end up using abandoned=yes and disused=yes. Maybe the renderer should treat lifecycle prefixes on physical objects differently. Or the wiki should be amended to state that disused=yes is valid and preferred to a lifecycle prefix on physical objects. Or something. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
