On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 21:02, António Madeira <antoniomade...@gmx.com> wrote:
> > Às 10:15 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu: > > > They're the ones you'd have to convince to alter their code to handle your > proposed change. > > > You mean this? > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map > That's where it's documented. The map is here: gk.historic.place If you've not played with it before, here's a place where I've added most of the heritage info: http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html?zoom=16&lat=52.03846&lon=-4.46621&detail=3&pid=HaHbHcSaHe The "problem" with criteria is that it seems to be used with numbers or > abbreviations, like a list that corresponds to some longer definitions. > That's how others have done it, listing what those abbreviations mean on the wiki page. But there's nothing (I can see) that says you have to restrict yourself to abbreviations. Since heritage=* is largely ruled over by the historical places people, the best place to get an opinion is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lutz In the end, he and his team decide how the historical places map interpret the tags. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
