On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Well, yes, voting "no" is probably not useful, but this is also the
> least "interesting" bit of the proposal. The purpose here would be just
> to bless the tag with "status=approved" rather than "status=de-facto".
>

But it wasn't approved by a formal vote.  If you mark it status=approved
then
it ought to be possible to find the vote that approved it.  Maybe we need
a different status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and
most people are happy with it" but we don't have that.  Please don't
misuse "approved" to mean that.

-- 
Paul
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to