I would assume that this is unwanted based on my above citations from their scope document. Was this not your reading on this question? Although, if we ask, they _may_ decide to change their scope based on our needs, but as estimated, this would greatly increase their expenses.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:23 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > I would ask on Commons whatever it would be acceptable, I would not just > assume that > this is unwanted. > > Aug 27, 2020, 12:18 by bkil.hu...@gmail.com: > > Then there's OpenTrailView as a viable alternative (neither Mapillary, nor > OpenStreetCam has a free server component), although in the long term, I > think we should follow an IPFS, P2P or federated-systems route to scale > costs. > > I don't feel it's fair to overload Commons by shifting the costs of all of > our street level imagery to them. If we for whatever reason wanted to stick > to a centralized solution, OSMF should be the one paying the costs, but > then we would pay dearly (someone on Reddit did some estimates). > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:59 AM Thibault Molleman < > thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > - I'm doubtful of the future of openstreetcam > - some people don't like Facebook to the point where they don't want to > use mapillary so we need to have an alternative > > And that still doesn't solve the problem of not having a system to put > multiple images into one tag > > Cheers > Thibault > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 00:21 bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Have you considered uploading these to OpenStreetCam, Mapillary or > whatever comes after OSM migrates away from that one? > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:37 PM Martin Koppenhoefer < > dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > > On 26. Aug 2020, at 15:21, Jake Edmonds via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I meant that images of generic drinking fountains can go in > ‘Drinking fountains in <location>’ and only need one image linked to the > node. > > A unique fountain deserves its own category > > > I named the fountains as an example where I see one image as sufficient. > Of course you could also make tens of each, with details, from all sides > and so on, but for me 1 is completely ok, serves to give an impression. > > On the other hand, city gates should have at least 2, one from the outside > and one from the inside, in those cases I have recently seen, and you can’t > do it with the image tag (a category for every individual city gate seems > overkill too in many cases). > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
