Then there's OpenTrailView as a viable alternative (neither Mapillary, nor
OpenStreetCam has a free server component), although in the long term, I
think we should follow an IPFS, P2P or federated-systems route to scale
costs.

I don't feel it's fair to overload Commons by shifting the costs of all of
our street level imagery to them. If we for whatever reason wanted to stick
to a centralized solution, OSMF should be the one paying the costs, but
then we would pay dearly (someone on Reddit did some estimates).

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:59 AM Thibault Molleman <
thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote:

> - I'm doubtful of the future of openstreetcam
> - some people don't like Facebook to the point where they don't want to
> use mapillary  so we need to have an alternative
>
>  And that still doesn't solve the problem of not having a system to put
> multiple images into one tag
>
> Cheers
> Thibault
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 00:21 bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have you considered uploading these to OpenStreetCam, Mapillary or
>> whatever comes after OSM migrates away from that one?
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:37 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <
>> dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sent from a phone
>>>
>>> > On 26. Aug 2020, at 15:21, Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
>>> tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Sorry, I meant that images of generic drinking fountains can go in
>>> ‘Drinking fountains in <location>’ and only need one image linked to the
>>> node.
>>> > A unique fountain deserves its own category
>>>
>>>
>>> I named the fountains as an example where I see one image as sufficient.
>>> Of course you could also make tens of each, with details, from all sides
>>> and so on, but for me 1 is completely ok, serves to give an impression.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, city gates should have at least 2, one from the
>>> outside and one from the inside, in those cases I have recently seen, and
>>> you can’t do it with the image tag (a category for every individual city
>>> gate seems overkill too in many cases).
>>>
>>> Cheers Martin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to