I think that additional restrictions are unnecessary, unless proper reason.
чт, 20 окт. 2022 г., 15:44 Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com>: > I agree that it got a little out of hand, but there were some good > proposals and votes as well. > Proposing and voting should not be hard, so you always get some lesser > quality stuff. > > Let's not throw away the baby with the wash water. > > Peter Elderson > > > Op do 20 okt. 2022 om 14:28 schreef Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> the past few weeks have been stormy for proposals: >> - people opening 4 or more RFCs to collect opinions >> - RFCs or votes that open and close in less than 12 hours >> - Proposals that go to vote on the 14th day, even though >> this is the minimum time limit and the problems in progress >> have sometimes not been resolved. >> - nominees to make even more simultaneous proposals >> without showing that it is just one person >> >> How could we improve this ? >> - limit to 1 simultaneous proposal per person? >> - limit this to active contributor status in the osmf sense? >> - encourage the use of the "resolved" tag in the talk page >> to see visually if the points have been addressed or not? >> - improve the wording for the 14 day minimum time limit which >> is too often understood lately as "pfff 14 days to wait" ? >> - limit the scope of proposal ? >> - any other ideas? >> >> Regards, >> Marc >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
