@Marc_marc - limit to 1 simultaneous proposal per person?
I oppose this idea. Sometimes people just have plenty of free time and good ideas and use this to make and share proposals. I see no reason to hinder them. - limit this to active contributor status in the osmf sense? I strongly oppose this. The OSMF does not control OSM and it should stay that way. If people want to improve OSM without having to get directly involved with the OSMF I see no reason to hinder them. - encourage the use of the "resolved" tag in the talk page to see visually if the points have been addressed or not? I support this idea, but I would not make it mandatory. Sometimes proposals are good enough, and not all issues can reasonably be resolved. - improve the wording for the 14 day minimum time limit which is too often understood lately as "pfff 14 days to wait" ? Suggestions for this can be put forward on the Talk page of the "Proposal process" Wiki page. - limit the scope of proposal ? I see no reason to do so. Recently the Belariusian community agreed to a big change in how languages are tagged. What alternative platform for discussing and voting on this would you offer them? All this said, I do appreciate good quality proposals and constructive discussions. I'm happy with all these creative proposals that are being put forward. OSM isn't finished yet, after all. Op do 20 okt. 2022 om 15:06 schreef Illia Marchenko < illiamarchenk...@gmail.com>: > I think that additional restrictions are unnecessary, unless proper reason. > > чт, 20 окт. 2022 г., 15:44 Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com>: > >> I agree that it got a little out of hand, but there were some good >> proposals and votes as well. >> Proposing and voting should not be hard, so you always get some lesser >> quality stuff. >> >> Let's not throw away the baby with the wash water. >> >> Peter Elderson >> >> >> Op do 20 okt. 2022 om 14:28 schreef Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com>: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the past few weeks have been stormy for proposals: >>> - people opening 4 or more RFCs to collect opinions >>> - RFCs or votes that open and close in less than 12 hours >>> - Proposals that go to vote on the 14th day, even though >>> this is the minimum time limit and the problems in progress >>> have sometimes not been resolved. >>> - nominees to make even more simultaneous proposals >>> without showing that it is just one person >>> >>> How could we improve this ? >>> - limit to 1 simultaneous proposal per person? >>> - limit this to active contributor status in the osmf sense? >>> - encourage the use of the "resolved" tag in the talk page >>> to see visually if the points have been addressed or not? >>> - improve the wording for the 14 day minimum time limit which >>> is too often understood lately as "pfff 14 days to wait" ? >>> - limit the scope of proposal ? >>> - any other ideas? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marc >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
