Absolutely no offense was taken, hence the winky ;)... it was solely the moment of realisation of my current ignorance on the matter... which I don't take as a bad thing. It's a new opportunity to learn more, so much thanks for taking the time to respond comprehensively and not just 'RTFM' me. Will process the rest of your lengthy message shortly.
It's quite related, but for anyone into waterways, topology, and aethestics, I discovered 'Relative Elevation Maps' the other day, and they are *stunning*... would love to do the Hunter in this style. Intro: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/19b6bfe0c3aa454c853bd6d9b7228adf Dan making amazing art: https://twitter.com/geo_coe/status/1549953305110929408 and https://dancoecarto.com Tech howto: https://michaelpaulschramm.com/posts/2022-09-20-lidar-rem/ On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 11:56, stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > Josh (and talk-au list): My remarks certainly were not meant to be or > seem like an attack, against you or anybody in particular. I apologize to > you for my remarks: I did not mean to attack you and I am sorry it came > across that way. It was a reply to Joseph Crowell's remarks (his "side > note," really) that relations are "a nightmare to work with within iD and > one of the main reasons people switch to another editor." I was concurring > with Joseph and wanted to strengthen that with my added "positive" by > suggesting another editor (JOSM), which I consider superior for editing > relations (especially compared to iD).
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
