On 29/5/23 08:11, Joseph Crowell via Talk-au wrote:
Regular area shapes have a node limit that is quickly reached when
mapping rivers/lakes.
As a guide:
2,000 nodes to a way, 300 members to a relation...
Islands/islelets are also not properly cut out when they are created
within a water body.
The solution to both of these issues is creating a multipolygon with
relations.
On a side note, this is a nightmare to work with within iD and one of
the main reasons people switch to another editor.
Regards,
Joseph Crowell
*Software Development Manager**,*
*Computerlink Logo***
**
*Unit 24 115 Dollis Street Rocklea Qld 4106.
T: +61 7 3211 5662 | F: +61 7 3211 5663*
*/email: /**/[email protected]_/**//*
*//*
Disclaimer:
The email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may
be subject to copyright. They are intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
this message in error please notify Computerlink Pty Ltd immediately
by return email or by calling +61 7 3211 5662. The republication and
re-dissemination are strictly prohibited without the express prior
consent of Computerlink Pty Ltd.
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Computerlink Pty Ltd
except where an authorised sender specifically states them to be the
views of Computerlink Pty Ltd.
It is your responsibility to verify this email and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. Computerlink Pty Ltd accepts no liability for
any damage caused by any virus transmitted.
On 26/05/2023 5:42 pm, Tom Brennan wrote:
On 26/05/2023 1:54 pm, Josh Marshall wrote:
> But I’ve also made relations for all of our local streams and creeks;
> go to the Newcastle area and search for Ironbark or Cottage Creek for
> instance… it used to just return a single hit on one small section
> for almost every creek. My interest here is because much of the area
> was uninhabitable swamp until there was a huge effort to put in some
> monster drains in the 1890s. And yet it will still occasionally flood
> and people complain about council not doing anyway…
Just asking out of interest - what's the reason for using relations?
Or is it specifically for the search that you mentioned?
> Do note, the DCS map can be quite wrong in places… I’m pretty sure a
> lot of it was done once and then never updated.
Yes, I don't like the current DCS stream layer - streams going up and
over ridges in some places!
I understand that DCS is in the process of bringing the stream data
up to date post the LIDAR scans of all of NSW. But it sounds like it
is bogged down in some non-technical issues (ie nothing related to
the actual dataset). So no idea when it will be released!
I'd be interested if anyone knows anything definite about the data -
my info is hearsay.
cheers
Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
