Hi Marc, No need to split mails. As for splitting roads, I'd say: more detail is better. So if the properties change it might be interesting to split.
If you look at the sign as if it were a directional sign (wegwijzer) (more of the information on it points you to the other street), rather than a name sign, then that may be a reason to expand the BW and VW to Buurtweg and Voetweg. It would make the data more consistent with how it's done in the rest of Flanders. And it may help people determine more quickly what those BW and VW stand for... Just like with wiki editing: be bold. No need to hesitate. It's a work in progress and nobody expects anybody to get it all perfectly right the first time. The little pole is a barrier=bollard Voorkeuze/Highways/Barrières/Verkeerspaal I changed the number of Print&Bottle to 37 and removed number 37 from the other building. If there are more houses there now than what is visible on bing, then you can simply add a node with addr:housenumber=xx for the houses the outline is not clear for. If you like you can add that node to the associatedStreet relation as well. Cheers, Polyglot 2011/4/16 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> > Hi all, > > > Now, I really understand why I was hesitating to start adding roads. ;-) > > Anyhow, I'll change it to 'track'. > > Here's the sign that you can find at the ends of Voetwegen and Burrtwegen > in Rumst (incl. Terhaghe, Reet) and Boom > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-6r5rqGd/0/S/dsc_5065-S.jpg > > This is why I called it BW23. After they started placing those signs a > couple of years ago, it took me awhile before I knew what BW and VW meant. > > It is still unclear to me which name I should use. I'm in favor of BW23, > since that is on the sign. > > Now for the surface. Do I have to split the road each time the surface > changes ? > First it is asphalt (the part that was already in OSM before I started), > then it turns into this > > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-K27fcBJ/0/M/dsc_5067-S.jpg a > combination of sand and stones, mostly sand. A bit further more sand and > less stones (this part becomes muddy when it rains) > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg > > After the turn it is more grass and less sand > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg > > A bit further it is again a clearly track, grass in the middle sand + > little stones (kiezel) on the sides (no picture) > > So what do I do for that ? I know unpaved was the simple solution ;-) > > > > Another path looks like this: > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg > > It is possible to drive there (house owner does this), so it is a track. > What do I do with the little pole at the end ? It prevents cars from > passing, but cyclist can. > > > > > A totally unrelated question: > > The N171 is not finished yet, far from, they still have to start. However > it is already drawn on OSM. Are there tags to indicate that it is planned, > or do you have to remove it (the non-existing segment) for now ? > > > Jo, I will look at your changes, since the numbering is incorrect. > Print&Bottle is nr 37, the building was marked as Schotte&Co before I > changed it. We live in nr 35, our house is not yet marked as a building, > neither is the house of our neighbor. I have to verify the number of the > building that is currently marked as 37. It should be 31 or so. > > > regards > > m > > > p.s. Do I have to split mails with many questions into smaller ones ? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
