While starting to change a mini_roundabout which wasn't actually a mini_roundabout, I went a little overboard and this is the result:
It is a 'verhoogd kruispunt', so I tagged all the elevated ways with: traffic_calming=table And the places where the bumps are 'felt' with: traffic_calming=bump I added the cycleways and cycleway tags and then I had to change the rcn and rwn relations The rcn had this, which I have been removing everywhere, since it's a Dutch word: nettype=knoop I left these tags: rit=xxxxx Although I don't know what they stand for and where they come from. Should they stay? Are they useful for anyone? I don't think rit is an English term and there are maybe 100-150 out of 5000 routes which have this tag. Concerning the nettype. While editing a bit in Germany (and in the border area Hohes Venn), my script ran in trouble when trying to detect new rcn routes, because the Germans use rcn for many different kinds of cycle routes. In the mean time I found that normally I can distinguish between the cycle node networks because we don't use ref tags and they do on the other networks. While 'complaining' about the mess, they suggested I add an additional tag to the cycle node network rcn relations, since those were the exception worldwide. So, does it make sense to add something like: network:type = numbered_nodes nettype = numbered_nodes to our rcn networks? Sorry for rambling on and on... those are questions that I've been wondering about for a while and which all surfaced now during the editing of a simple junction... Jo _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
