On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 07:55:59PM +0200, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote: > 2013/10/11 Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:03:04PM +0200, Pieter Colpaert wrote: > > > Can we have a vote (e.g. doodle?) for this? It's important that this > > > person can indeed represent OSM under a consensus. > > > > Isn't that something for the vzw/asbl to decide when it exists? I > > would assume a member of the board to represent us, like the > > secretary or president. > > > > the idea is that the existing vzw/asbl that is OKFN open a new section > that will be OSM-Be
So basicly there will be no OSM-be, only OKFN? > In such a way, we do not need to create a new, specific association, but > rather be part of a larger one that gets bigger, more representative of > open data and open culture in Belgium and also takes part of the overhead > (eg with accounting) in counterpart of asking a fair 5 % of our budget. > > As a project of OKFN, we (the Osm-Be de facto existing «association») would > get one board member. We are already a de facto association, so nothing will change? Or will be somehow be able to represent OKFN-BE? Kurt _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
