I know, just figured this out myself, I didn't know, I'll correct it. 14-01-15 17:54, Marc Gemis wrote: > one small mistake from your side :-) > building=residential is allowed, > see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential > But if it was building=house (or another more specialised description) > before, it would be wrong to retag it of course. > > regards > > m > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be > <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>> wrote: > > I really start hating the ID editor + bing as a background. I completed > all streetnames/buildings on postal codes 1980/1981/1982 > > This changeset pretty much destroyed most of my work, simple buildings > are turned into multipolygons, building=residential. > > Realigning the buildings is piece of cake luckily. The worst part is > that he actually thinks he's corrected stuff. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28140575 > > The common denominator is always ID + Bing. > > Glenn > > -- > "Everything is going to be 200 OK." > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
-- "Everything is going to be 200 OK." _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
