Jonathan Bennett wrote: > > If they've been published, that's actually a very good reason *not* to > > map them, unless there are signposts on the ground. It's a clear > > violation of copyright without specific written permission.
I've obtained permission to publish the routes under CC-BY-SA. This was the first thing I did. > > Furthermore, unless the group has based its maps on OSM in the first > > place, the chances are there will be a derived data problem -- who owns > > the original mapping the routes were plotted against? The routes are primarily published as a description i.e. "Starting at X, take the first left, after five hundred meters you come to..." Regards, James _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
