16 Dec 2019, 11:07 by revi...@pacific-rim.net:
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Dave F via Talk-GB" <> talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> >
> To: > talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Sent: 14/12/2019 15:54:13
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] What is farmland?
>
>
>> On 14/12/2019 15:19, Martin Wynne wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is this "farmland"?
>>>
>>> >>> http://85a.uk/haws_hill_960x600.jpg
>>>
>>
>> I would say yes, as I believe both arable & livestock is farmland.
>>
>> I concur with your frustration about 'huge multi polygons', especially when
>> joined to other features such as roads & rivers. I believe a few mappers
>> were keen to fill in the gaps rather than map accurately. Personally I think
>> there should be one polygon per field, but I admit that makes for a lot more
>> work.
>>
>>
> I see no benefit to mapping individual fields as separate polygons tagged as
> farmland if adjacent fields are also farmland. Could you explain why you
> think this is best?
>
Allows to distinguish between one huge
field and multiple small, less likely to
degenerate into uneditable multipolygon
with far too many ways.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
