On Monday, 16 December 2019, David Groom wrote: > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Dave F via Talk-GB" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > Sent: 14/12/2019 15:54:13 > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] What is farmland? > > >On 14/12/2019 15:19, Martin Wynne wrote: > >> > >>Is this "farmland"? > >> > >> http://85a.uk/haws_hill_960x600.jpg > > > >I would say yes, as I believe both arable & livestock is farmland. > > > >I concur with your frustration about 'huge multi polygons', especially when > >joined to other features such as roads & rivers. I believe a few mappers > >were keen to fill in the gaps rather than map accurately. Personally I think > >there should be one polygon per field, but I admit that makes for a lot more > >work. > > > I see no benefit to mapping individual fields as separate polygons > tagged as farmland if adjacent fields are also farmland. Could you > explain why you think this is best? > > David >
Large polygons make future editing very difficult. It is very beneficial to differentiate between arable, pasture and hopefully we can get real meadow back from the misuse it has received. Farming use changes, mapping individual fields allows farmland types or other changes to be maintained far easier than if it is part of a huge polygon. All in all it goes to make for a better more usable map. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
