Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:15, Russ Nelson<r...@cloudmade.com> wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 8:27 AM, David Lynch wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10, Russ Nelson<r...@cloudmade.com> wrote: >>> An even more aggressive fix would be to >>> disconnect everything that isn't a motorway_link. That's probably >>> correct, but more aggressive than I would choose to implement. >> >> Not a good idea at all, IMO. I can think of numerous places within 50 >> miles of my home where, due to existing highways being upgraded to >> motorway or towns being bypassed by freeway/motorway-grade highway, >> there are nodes which have bo > > When an automated edit can fix 98% of things that are wrong, breaks 1% > of things that are correct, and falsely fixes 1% things that didn't > need fixing, is it good or bad? > > My feeling is ZOMG! Let's DO IT, NOW, but I think that you may > disagree, and I'm wondering why you would. > > -- > Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson > r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - > http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- David J. Lynch djly...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
