On 09/09/2009 12:05 PM, Chris Hunter wrote: > yes, yes, yes - this is the most sane summary of the road/track debate I've > seen in quite a while. Of course, it also reopens the track/path argument, > but I'll leave that to others to battle out.
How is there even an argument there? track is for cars and always has been, while path is for not-cars and always has been. -Alex Mauer “hawke”
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
