On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:20 PM Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: > On 9/22/2020 8:56 PM, Karson Sommer wrote: > > > > Looking around the area of the edit, there is a lot of stuff from my > > perspective that seems fishy. There are a bunch of place=hamlet nodes? I > > certainly don't see anything that should be tagged as a hamlet, they all > > look like place=neighborhood to me. Each of these nodes should be mapped > > onto an explicit residential area. > > The extra hamlet nodes are import remainders that haven't yet been > converted to landuse areas. The general landuse zones for that area > have been identified, but do not exactly correspond to the named > subdivisions. As I get a chance to survey, I divide the landuse into > subdivisions and convert the node to a named area for the subdivision. >
Please don't expand these as landuse, please expand them as place=neighborhood instead. Landuse polygons should be congruent to the actual land use.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
