Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Robert Vollmert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think the problem I'm trying to address clearly: >> >> To map a lake in a forest area, I should currently create both a >> closed way with natural=water, and a closed way that is an 'inner' >> member of the forest's multipolygon relation. Both of these ways >> share the same nodes (and may or may not need to be oriented in >> special ways). >> > > Hmm, I thought you could use the inner natural=water as the boundary > of the forest? Does this not work? > > FWIW, I'd just had a layer=1 to the lake and forget about the multipolygon. > > Have a nice day, > That's fine if you look at OSM data from the presentation viewpoint only. But what if sometime in the future somebody wanted to calculate its surface area? ;)
Igor -- http://igorbrejc.net _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
