Hi, >> True, but since there can only be one circumference of a polygon, >> could we not specify that if more than one "outer" ways exist in a >> multipoly relation, these will be merged to make the circumference? > > That would be very confusing. I'd expect "outer" and "inner" ways to be > the same kind of way (closed). Several "outer_part" ways instead of one > "outer" would be better, but that's still not good: What if an inner way > is also so long you'd like to split it up?
*Then* we'd have to implement a generic system whereby any of the outer/inner members can be replaced by relations grouping multiple way parts, as you said. But if I were to implement solutions for all the hypothetical problems that I can think of, I'd get nowhere... > Basically, I think using several open "outer" ways like this is abusing > the fact that there's just one outer way to start with. I didn't want to *abuse* the fact. I wanted to use it cleverly to make things easier for people. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
