-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > >>> We have no mechanism to divide "good" from "bad" ideas. If you start >>> putting your ideas about what you think is good and "should" be used on >>> Map Features, then I will start putting mine on there as well, and >>> everyone else. That's why we don't want to go down this road. (And >>> before anyone asks, a vote in which 0.01% of mappers participate does >>> not elevate one idea about what is "good" above hundreds of others.) >> I agree with you here, but voting seems to be the current practice. > > It may seem so, but in fact voting is just a pastime of a tiny minority > of OSMers; the vast majority don't care for either the process or the > results.
You allege that, but what evidence do you have to back it up? I for one don't vote very much, but do care about due process and the results. I will follow the tagging advice that has been voted for, because I know that several people have thought about the issues and more of them thought one option was better than the other. Robert (Jamie) Munro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkj/MWUACgkQz+aYVHdncI0vTACgpMHHZ//LnFTT9Fcu4sONJ7js ukgAn1dECxM5SJvx8vgInlc4LazqtOhc =Nop4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
