On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Jukka Rahkonen <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>wrote:
> Why not to store this kind of datasets as own layers in the database? DEC > data > could be on its own, non-editable layer, but if there's something that > people > would like to edit those features could be copied or lifted to anothet, OSM > layer. That would make DEC updates easier as well, they would just update > the > DEC layer. The same approach would suit other data of similar nature as > well, > like TIGER or cadastrial data. > > +1 Having multiple separate "layers" in OSM would be good for various purposes. The GPS traces "layer" is already one we use. Eugene / seav
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk