--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > That's proposing highway=rural as something less > significant than tertiary > (bad, we already have unclassified for that), not something > less significant > than unclassified (good, we don't have anything like that > in rural areas).
The distinction is that highway=rural isn't as well maintained, or has as much traffic as highway=residential, so if residential is lower than unclassified, then rural is lower than residential, but higher than track _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk