2009/8/26 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John Smith<delta_foxt...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> --- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Pre-processor finds a stop sign, looks for the nearest junction node which >> it would already know is a junction for routing purposes. > > Not too bad when you put it like that. Thanks :) If this is written up > as a proposal, I would prefer it worded like that (with reference to a > *requirement to stop* at the *nearest junction node* when *approached > from the way on which the node is placed*), rather than referring to > "stop signs".
What about railway crossings? I've seen railway crossings with no lights, gates or similar, just a stop sign. Usually way out in the middle of nowhere, so there may not be a routable junction for quite some distance, and even if there was, the sign doesn't apply to that junction anyway. Would a railway/road crossing count as a "nearest node junction", or would it try and apply it to something else? Stephen _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
