SteveC wrote: > > On 30 Sep 2009, at 17:54, Dave F. wrote: > >> SteveC wrote: >>> On 30 Sep 2009, at 16:14, Russ Nelson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> SteveC writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Yeah, OK Dave, we've got the message, you don't free-format tags. >>>>>> Unfortunately you're going to have to get used to it, because it >>>>>> is the basis of the OPENstreetmap and, in my opinion, one of the >>>>>> reasons it is as successful as it is. >>>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>> -1. Don't confuse anarchy with chaos. SteveC is our leader (and >>>> should behave as such by Giving Advice), but he's only our leader so >>>> far as he gives Good Advice. >>>> >>> >>> It turns out I'm still allowed my opinions, and y'know given that I >>> designed and implemented freeform tags... I think I'm allowed to >>> promote them. >>> >> Free form Tags - Good, duplicate/irrelevant data - Bad. > > Nuclear power - good, nuclear weapons/contamination - Bad. > > C'mon... freeform tags set the community free, if you have a better > alternative please outline it? > > And by better, I mean one that on balance allows the most people to > participate and generate good data. > I Have.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk