I think everyone agrees that detailed legal discussion belongs on the legal list.
Questions such as how any licence transition should proceed, deletion of existing bits of map, and how to organize the voting process are not legal arcana but questions of project governance, and surely belong on this list. I am sorry I asked about what Microsoft and others would like to see from OSM's licensing terms. I hoped that some concrete answers would help discussion to move on from the mostly fixed positions and legal nitpicking we see on the legal mailing list (of which I am just as guilty as anyone else). But I guess the big mapping sites are not willing to make a public statement for fear of being seen to influence the project. That is a shame, since we are somewhat in the dark about what the rest of the world thinks. -- Ed Avis <e...@waniasset.com> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
