On onsdag den 26. april 2017 07.22.27 CEST Ture Pålsson wrote: > > 25 apr. 2017 kl. 21:52 skrev Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > sent from a phone > > > > On 25. Apr 2017, at 19:07, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de <mailto:o...@westnordost.de>> wrote: > >> I would say so, as long as there are not in reality two cycleways (see > >> above). Wouldn't you? > > > > it depends on the meaning/reading. I believe cycleway=track is bad anyway, > > it's ok for preliminary mapping but fails when it comes to […] > On a side note, around where I live I see quite a few cycleways mapped as > their own ways, tagged highway=cycleway,cycleway=track. Does the > cycleway=track mean anything in this context (and if so: what?) or is it a > mapping error?
In that context it's a mistake. Also in my opinion cycleway=track is not bad. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
