Am 04.08.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Thursday 03 August 2017, Simon Poole wrote: >> Dear all >> >> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and >> consultation on our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring >> forward to the OSMF board for adoption as a formal policy, please see >> the text here: >> >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trademark_Policy#OpenStreetMap_Tr >> ademark_Policy > Am i reading this right that to comply with both the ODbL and the > trademark policy i would have to - when using OSM data - add both > > Contains data Copyright OpenStreetMap Contributors > > and > > OpenStreetMap is a trademark of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, and is > used with their permission. This product is not endorsed by or > affiliated with the OpenStreetMap Foundation. We will add a clarification (which was in the original text) to the FAQ, we are not requiring the trademark notice as part of the attribution text.
> > Also i am not sure if according to this policy i would have to obtain > permission from the OSMF to use the term 'OpenStreetMap' when > advertising commercial services and products based on OpenStreetMap > data. This could be considered to fall under 3.3 > (nominative/referential use) but 3.3.3 specifically excludes commercial > purposes. > I don't quite see why you believe there is a conflict, nominative use, for example in the description of a product or service, is a completely different kettle of fish than use in a product/service name or on or as part of a product. Example the difference between saying "XY utilizes OpenStreetMap(TM) data to do Z" and naming a product "OpenStreetMap XY". Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
