2017-10-27 12:25 GMT+03:00 Dave F wrote: > You appear to be differentiating based on size & location which, seeing > OSM's output is visual & geospatial seems unnecessary.
If we make no such distinction, then in order to be topographically correct, we would have to "cut out" (create multipolygons) for each small wood areas with 10 trees inside say residential area. > *All* groups of trees are 'natural' so there should only be one primary tag. > All "purposes" should be within sub-tags. Fine. Let's say in higher level there is only one "forest". Then my topic moves one layer down and stays exactly the same otherwise. What I'm talking is about virtual hierarchy. OSM tagging comes AFTER that. -- Tomas _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
