On 27-Oct-17 08:25 PM, Dave F wrote:
You appear to be differentiating based on size & location which,
seeing OSM's output is visual & geospatial seems unnecessary.
*All* groups of trees are 'natural' so there should only be one
primary tag. All "purposes" should be within sub-tags.
Your definition of 'natural' must be different for mine. :)
A tree that is grown in a nursery from grafted stock, planted and
nurtured in a green house and then finally planted outside ... to me is
not 'natural'.
A 'natural' tree grown from a seed that comes off a tree by natural
means, falls to the ground and than grows without human interference to
full size.
--------------
? "All "purposes" should be within sub-tags. "
Umm so you would remove landuse? landuse=residential would be a subtag
.. under what?
I think landuse is a good classification and should remain.
Areas used for forestry should be able to be tagged under a landuse tag.
If the present landuse=forest is confusing then change it .. to, say
landuse=forestry.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
