JB, try to avoid swearword outburst, not helpful. Are you taking issue with the word "deprecated"? The proper word should probably have been "unnecessary" to discuss the layer=0, per JOSM's naming: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss
The wiki deprecation only lists one =no: highway=no, but we are not discussing that one yet -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features I used the word "deprecated" in a more general term, to mean anything that community has decided to phase out, such as JOSM autofixes and deprecation list. I have no clue what you meant otherwise about mixing issues. I am attempting to answer every possible question being raised. So far there has been a few very constructive and helpful emails, and lots of sidetracks. If you want to stay focused, re-read my initial post, as well as my most latest post with the new tool capabilities, or just read the Sophox wiki page and try to follow the style of Simon & Tobias - both have raised valid objections, and in both cases it resulted in tool's improvements. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:05 AM, JB <jb...@mailoo.org> wrote: > Le 13/11/2017 à 01:16, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit : > >> You are right that =0 and =no seem like nobrainers, but if we have listed >> them as deprecated, we should not use them. >> > Deprecated? Where did you find that? > (Swearwords somewhere here. Did someone already said that you mix issues?) > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
