For JOSM
See this JOSM ticket that address transfer of HOT TM tags
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10758and this HOT TM ticket
https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/703
Pierre
Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 16:49:39 HNE, Bryan Housel
<br...@7thposition.com> a écrit :
Hey Martijn, it’s currently possible to send comments and hashtags to iD (they
can be sent as two different parameters, or just embed the hashtags in the
comments like the task managers currently do). It’s not possible to set other
changeset tags, but it is something I could add if there is a good use case for
it.
Thanks, Bryan
> On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> That is a good idea and there are already some ‘hashtags’ that MapRoulette
> sends to JOSM. I don’t know if this is possible in iD as well. I think it is
> something that could be improved upon. Perhaps with changeset tags (is that
> what you are suggesting?)
>
> Does anyone know if JOSM and / or iD support ‘sending’ changeset tags through
> remote control / the querystring?
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Martijn van Exel
>
> On November 20, 2017 at 2:00:36 PM, Pierre Béland (pierz...@yahoo.fr) wrote:
>> Hi Martijn
>> We see an increase of coordinatead actions via QA and TM tools. But this is
>> not systematically
>> documented on the Changeset metadata. For QA tools, sometimes we see in the
>> comments
>> reference to MapRoulette or other tools.
>> It is possible for these tools to transfer infos to editors such as iD and
>> JOSM. It would
>> be good that tags are transferred to the editors to better document the
>> coordinated actions.
>> For TM tools, it could be host and project_no / Title. For QA, it could be
>> host and project.
>> For Maroulette this could beQA=MaprouleteProject=XXX where XXX corresponds
>> to a particular
>> challenge.
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 15:50:21 HNE, Martijn van Exel a écrit :
>>
>> Marc,
>>
>> Good point and something that has come up often.
>> As Joost mentioned in a reply, the easy solution for this is, as a challenge
>> owner, to split
>> up the challenge into regional chunks and label them as such.
>>
>> The new version will have ‘filter by current map bounds’. I’m not quite sure
>> how to best
>> do this yet. One solution would be to filter by challenge ‘centroids’
>> (simple), another
>> would be to consider whatever challenge has at least one task within the
>> current map bounds
>> (harder). What would be your idea about this? Others with an opinion?
>> --
>> Martijn van Exel
>>
>> On November 20, 2017 at 9:58:40 AM, Marc Gemis (marc.ge...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> The possibility to work more locally. E.g. there is a project to add
>>> missing roads in Belgium, I would really like to see only the "issues"
>>> within let say 20km of my house (an arbitrary point I can set).
>>>
>>> m.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> For those who have used MapRoulette or at least have a good understanding
>>>> of
>>>> what it does: what would be the *one top thing* for you that would make it
>>>> better?
>>>>
>>>> I am asking because I am working on a new major release.
>>>> --
>>>> Martijn van Exel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> talk mailing list
>>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
