Hi, Am 2018-01-12 um 17:01 schrieb Tobias Knerr: > On 12.01.2018 15:39, Andy Townsend wrote: >> More seriously, any automatic use of OSM messages is problematical >> because it devalues the messages that we want people to actually read - >> the ones that are composed by and sent be a human, and have actual >> useful information in them > > I agree. Right now, messages and comments sent via OSM channels tend to > be written by humans for a specific individual recipient, which gives > them a very good signal-to-noise ratio. I enjoy that a lot and would > like to keep things that way.
We could introduce a special kind of changeset discussion comment which does trigger email notification. Any comment which is automatically generated should be such a "silent comment". Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
